If I sum up everything I have ever read about Iran‘s pursuit of nuclear weapons, if the United States would agree to join in, Israel would attack Iran‘s nuclear sites without any hesitation. However, the situation is not nearly that simple, and the complexities of attacking Iran have Israel thinking twice about an attack.
While Israel is waiting patiently, the date when an attack might be necessary is quickly approaching. Iran has four planned nuclear sites, and enrichment is taking place today. While they claim it is peaceful, Iran‘s leaders have publicly called for a genocide against the Jewish people in Israel.
Charles Levinson at The Wall Street Journal did a great analysis of Israel’s reasons for attacking and reasons for waiting. Of course, the great reason to attack is to protect Israelis (and other Western countries, whether they believe it or not) from the threats of a radical, Islamic, nuclear armed, terrorist supporting country. The list of reasons not to attack is much longer.
First off, the physical difficulty of the attack makes the chances of success far less than 100%. Iran has anti-aircraft weapons, heavily secured nuclear sites deep underground, and has neighbors far from friendly to Israel separating it from harm. In the event Israel were to attack, it would have to route planes over Turkey and Iraq or Saudi Arabia. Both are Muslim countries friendly to the United States, and breaking their trust would not be an easy thing for Israel or the US to overcome.
Second, Israel has a great, through seemingly deteriorating, relationship with the United States. The US has been a great supporter over the years, and $3 billion in IDF funds, along with most of its equipment, is nothing to scoff at. The United States also has a 200 person radar unit in Southern Israel that is very valuable in detecting rocket attacks from other countries around the Middle East.
If Israel were to just go and blow up Iran’s nuclear sites, the United States may be drawn into a war when its resources are already spread thin between Iraq and Afghanistan, both neighbors to Iran. Without formally declaring war, Iran could arm, equip, and promote attacks against US forces around the region and disrupt fuel supplies to the rest of the world. As Levinson points out, with gas at $10 per gallon, US citizens may force Israel friendly policies out the door.
The third major reason to hold back is security. If Israel attacks, it should expect a quick response. Iran has proxy armies in Gaza and Southern Lebanon that have shown that they do not mind a war with Israel. Iran also has long range missiles that can easily reach Israel, though the targeting systems are not sophisticated enough to guarantee a hit on civilian populated areas.
Israel has a strong missile defense system, and is rolling out a three layered defense system that would be able to target short range, medium range, and long range attacks. The bulk of missiles from Iran would likely be intercepted, but civilian loss of life would be likely, and military loss of life would be inevitable. Unlike Hamas and Hezbollah, Israelis care if its people are killed.
It seems that waiting is okay for now, due to the reasons above. It is important to note, though, that when an existential threat materializes, it is no doubt better to prevent an attack than wait to be wiped out. Every day, Iran is closer to having a nuclear bomb in its possession. That could end up in Hezbollah’s hands, Hamas’ hands, or on the top of a long range missile aimed at Tel Aviv. Any of those situations is completely unacceptable to Israel and should be to the United States as well.
The balance of power in the Middle East is at risk, and it is vital that Israel not wait until it is too late to keep Iran from having nuclear weapons. The United States is fully able to prevent this path, but it seems unwilling to make any solid steps today. We are waiting for sanctions to pass through the United Nations like a dog with its tail between its legs, and it is time to wake up to the realities of the world we live in today.




