JobKatif Helps Gush Katif Victims Find Jobs

This is a guest post from Yehudit at JobKatif, a non-profit dedicated to find employment for families impacted by the Gaza Strip disengagement.

Following the Israeli government’s investigation into the after-effects of the Disengagement this past summer, JobKatif has launched an on-site census of the former residents of Gush Katif and Northern Samaria.

No government office or entity has precise information or statistics about the former Gush Katif residents. While the Government Commission of Inquiry officially revealed that unemployment was a direct result of the Disengagement, JobKatif has discovered that the displaced families are suffering in many other ways.

“After almost five years, it is about time we get an overall picture of what condition these people are in,” says JobKatif Executive Director, Judy Lowy. “Statistics from the census will be used to help them in the most effective way. We felt this was necessary because the more we help them, the more we discover how in-depth the long-term problems are,” Lowy says.

Using the services of a group of consultants who specialize in employment, the organization hired and trained a staff of five people- all former Gush Katif residents. They are going door-to-door conducting interviews and using questionnaires to gain the only real comprehensive picture of their lives five years post-Disengagement.

“The only way we could get their full cooperation was by using people they trust to let in their [temporary] homes,” Lowy says.

JobKatif was recently awarded a conditional grant of $4.5 million on a matching basis by the Israeli government. The grant is contingent on the organization raising the equal amount. Every donation to JobKatif for the next five years will be matched 1:1.

Editors Note: I have visited the website and this is a wonderful answer to a difficult situation.  Please let people know about this cause, particularly if they are hiring in Israel.

Which is the Road to Damascus?

The recent escalation in rhetoric on both sides of the Israeli-Syrian border has, once again, raised the profile of the relationship between the two countries. Defence Minister Ehud Barak told a gathering of senior IDF officers last week that, in the absence of a peace deal, Israel could find itself at war with Syria. Syrian Foreign Minister, Walid Moallem, responded by saying that an attack on Syria would result in an all-out war. Israeli Foreign Minister, Avigdor Lieberman warned that a war with Syria would result in the Syrian President, Bashar Assad, losing power. All of this seems such a far cry from 2008 when peace talks were being conducted between Israel and Syria via the offices of the Turkish mediators. What has changed so dramatically in two short years? Like many other aspects of Middle East politics, I believe that the answer has everything to do with Iran.

Iran has long been a key player in regional politics. It was in 1984, only 5 years after the overthrow of the Shah, that Iran was designated for the first time as a state sponsor of terrorism by the US. As the main sponsor of groups such as Hezbollah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad and the al-Mahdi army, there can be no doubt that Iran is one of the world’s most significant state sponsors of terrorism. It was one of the country’s on President George W. Bush’s “axis of evil”, and with good reason. More recently, Iranian President Ahmadinejad has upped the ante by calling for Israel’s destruction at every opportunity. Iran’s continued threats along with its importance as a significant producer of oil mean that Iran is likely to continue to greatly influence Middle East politics in the near future.

On the face of things, Syria and Iran seem to have very little in common. Iran is a theocracy while Syria is secular. Iran is largely made up of Persians and Shiite Muslims while Syria is mostly comprised of Sunni Muslims. They do not share a border, although they do share Iraq and Turkey as neighbours. Behind the scenes, however, they have a great deal in common. Economically, Syria is drawn to its regional ally. In its position as a “pariah” state, Syria is forced to create economic links with all that will agree to have economic ties with her. As Syria’s oil production declines and, eventually runs out, there is no doubt that Syria will be looking to Iran as a way to fill the gap that this creates in the local market. The main point that the two countries have in common is political – hatred of Israel. It is this fact that has drawn the two countries together over the years, a bond that currently seems to be stronger than ever. For Iran, Syria is vital in this link as Syria has a direct land border with Israel. This is even more pronounced when considering the control that Syria exercises over the Hezbollah forces in Southern Lebanon. Even though Iranian missiles could easily reach Israeli soil, a direct land invasion of Israel would require access via one of Israel’s neighbours. Syria and Lebanon provide this access for Iran.

When Turkey offered the chance to engage with Syria, Israel smelled an important opportunity to try to drive a wedge between Syria and Iran. The chance to isolate Syria from Iran and prise it out of Iranian clutches appears to have been the main driving force behind Israel’s most recent attempts to negotiate a peace deal with Syria. There can be little doubt that such an agreement would weaken Iran’s access to Israel and, with it, the significant threat that Iran continues to pose to Israel.

For Syria, the decision whether to change the strategy that it has pursued against Israel for more than 60 years is not easy. The insult that Syrians continue to feel as a result of Israel having taken the Golan Heights during the Six Day War in 1967 seems to be a significant factor in shaping its foreign policy towards Israel. The optimism that was felt in western circles when Bashar Assad took over from his father in 2000 has largely not been borne out. Even though Dr. Bashar was viewed as more progressive than his father, and with a higher likelihood of guiding Syria towards closer links with the west, this has not happened. Syria can choose to keep close with Iran, keep sponsoring terror organisations and continue its relatively close links within the Arab world. Its alternative is to pursue a peace agreement with Israel and gain favour with the US and other western countries. Economically, the second is likely to be a much better option for Syria. Added to the fact that Syria and Iran are not comfortable bed partners, this is not beyond the realms of reality. Politically, however, Syria does not seem ready for this right now.

In the absence of being able to entice Syria away from its Iranian sponsor, there seems to be only one other way in which Dr. Bashar can be tempted towards closer western ties. This is to hope that Ahmadinejad can be unseated and that economic hardships in Iran will force it to give up its links with Syria (and hopefully, with it, the sponsorship of international terrorism). Until then, Syria will continue to warmonger and insult Israel in the knowledge that Iran stands right behind these threats. After all, Syria knows that, militarily, it is no match for Israel. Military threats will remain just that until Iran decides it wishes to take further action.

For Israel, any peace agreement with Syria must clearly require ties with Iran to be broken, and the cessation of the support of terrorist organisations. This is obviously in addition to the other more issues of the Golan Heights, water resources, military ceasefire and others. The real advantage to Israel of any peace with Syria is the cutting off of Iran’s supply route to its terror organisations. It is this issue that is driving Israel’s efforts to reach a peace with Assad’s regime. With the presence of Lieberman in the Israeli government and Dr. Bashar on the Syrian side, this seems unlikely to happen any time soon.

Goldstone, Oy!

It is, apparently, impossible to follow the news about Israel without encountering the (in)famous Goldstone Report. The news this week has to do with Goldstone’s connections to NGOs which opposed the war in Gaza before Goldstone conducted his “fact-finding” mission. It would be impossible, and relatively useless, to go through the various problems and inconsistencies in the report; you can’t throw a stone in the blogosphere without hitting someone who has done just that.

Instead, it is worthwhile for us to examine how Goldstone’s connections with certain NGOs would end up in the news. This piece claims that the judge’s association with so-called “anti-Israel groups” proves that his report is not trustworthy. There must be some truth to this claim; if Goldstone is frolicking in the fields with organizations that preach in favor of Israel’s destruction, then maybe he is not the most qualified person to lead a human rights investigation. Furthermore, Im Tirtzu suggests that much of the evidence found in the Goldstone report comes from Israeli organizations commonly supported by the New Israel Fund.

There is no question that the collection of organizations with which Goldstone is affiliated affects his ability to do an unbiased investigation. An objective report about any armed conflict is an impossible thing to produce. One’s loyalties to either the Israeli or Palestinian cause determine how one views the history and conflict of the region; the two sides tell very different stories to defend their actions and claims to the same land.

However, some of the organizations in question are internationally recognized groups like Amnesty International. While the agenda of these NGOs may not exactly be flattering (or even fair) to Israel, the allegation that someone who supports Amnesty absolutely cannot support Israel is absurd. Intelligent people learn to take ideologies with a grain of salt; neither Amnesty’s radical positions nor an “Israel can do no wrong” attitude stand up to the test of logic.

Unfortunately, the response from center-right or right-wing groups like Im Tirtzu has been a blanket dismissal of all criticism as “slander.” This response serves a political purpose but may not help improve Israel. In a democratic system, dissent plays a central role. Where there is disagreement in a democracy,  different sides of a debate should listen and internalize the arguments of opposing groups. Instead, many take the easy way out: ad hominem attacks or closed ears.

The important thing to realize is that NGOs on both sides of the political fence are working toward the common goal of a more secure and prosperous Israel. A supposedly unbiased report cannot take a significant amount of evidence from a number of politically-aligned organizations (who, not coincidentally, take their money from the same coffers). However, the report’s unreliability does not mean that we should not engage with it; instead, Israel should listen to and debate with its critics from all sides of the issue. It may be long past the time for extremists in all camps to listen more and talk less, but this is often not the way of extremism.

Italian Prime Minister Has Meaningful Visit

Italy’s Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi has had what appears to be a great trip to Israel.  His comments at Yad Vashem and the Knesset show that Italy is a friend of Israel and can be a great partner for years to come.

After a visit to Yad Vashem, Berlusconi said that seeing everything the Jews went through during World War II, partially facilitated by Italy, was “like being punched in the stomach,” according to YNet.  He went on to write in the Yad Vashem guest book: “Our soul screams out – ‘This cannot be’. Then it jolts and bellows – Never again!’”

He said on the same day that he has a great desire to see Israel admitted to the European Union.  Membership in that trade bloc could have wonderful long term economic benefits, not to mention the political benefit of being part of the most influential international body outside of the United Nations.

In a speech at a special Knesset session, Berlusconi said that the Goldstone report was simply a tool to criminalize Israel for actions that were legitimate and necessary.

The only cold moment came when Berlusconi compared Operation Cast Lead to the Holocaust.  At a meeting with PA dictatorPresident Mahmoud Abbas  “So just as it’s right to cry for the victims of the Shoah, it’s right to show pain for what happened in Gaza.”  Comparing a defensive military operation to the murder of 6 million innocent people is not going to score Italy any points.

In all, it was a positive trip for both Italy and Israel.  I hope to see this relationship grow in the future.

Explorers Find $7 billion Natural Gas Deposit

A Canadian oil and gas company doing an offshore test on Israel’s coast announced a natural gas find at the Sarah and Mira test sites worth well over $7 billion.  From Globes Online:

The Mira and Sarah prospects are located just south of the Tamar and Dalit prospects, where Delek Group Ltd. (TASE: DLEKG) and its partners, Noble Energy Inc. (NYSE: NBL), Isramco Ltd. (Nasdaq: ISRL; TASE: ISRA.L), and Dor Alon Energy in Israel (1988) Ltd. (TASE:DRAL) unit Dor Alon Energy Exploration Ltd found natural gas last year, which some sources estimate to be worth up to $40 billion. The prospects are north of Yam Tethys’ Mary prospects offshore from Ashkelon, BG Group plc’s (NYSE; LSE: BG) undeveloped fields offshore from Gaza, and East Mediterranean Gas Co. (EMG) fields offshore from El Arish in Sinai.

The find is good news for the Israeli economy.  While God’s practical joke of giving the Jewish people the only place in the Middle East without oil has held, technology has allowed deep water offshore exploration.  The natural gas is valuable in Israel and around the world primarily for heating and electricity production.

This bring the total finds around the area, as far as my research found, to nearly $50 billion.  I hope that businesses reinvest the profits into the Israeli economy rather than take them all abroad.

Welcome to the Newer (Faster) IsraelSituation.com

For those of you who follow the site by RSS, make sure to come by the homepage and see what we have done.  The site is now prettier and faster.  We upgraded the theme and our gracious web host has upgraded our server capacity so things should take about 5% of the time things took to load yesterday.

RSS readers, click on this link to get to the home page.  What do you all think of the new template?

US Intelligence: Hezbollah Arming for War With Israel

From Ha’aretz:

The U.S. is concerned that the continued flow of arms to the Hezbollah militant organization could prompt a war between Israel and Lebanon, State Department official Jeff Feltman said in remarks published Sunday by the London-based Al-Hayat daily.

Feltman, who serves as Assistant Secretary of U.S. State Department’s Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, told the daily that the U.S. had no evidence of any Israeli plan to attack its northern neighbor.

Nevertheless, Feltman said he was growing increasingly worried by reports describing the quantity and types of weapons being smuggled to the terrorist organization in clear violation of United Nations Resolution 1701, which put an end to the 2006 war.

The UN resolution clearly demanded a weapons-free south Lebanon, said Feltman, but the world had yet to see that put into play.

What does this mean?  The world is too busy criticizing Israel over Operation Cast Lead to notice the true cause of war in the Middle East.  It is not the small country trying to protect itself from terrorism, it is the terrorist group in Southern Lebanon and the terrorist group that violently took over the Gaza Strip that is causing the violence.

Haveil Havalim 254: Tu B’Shevat Edition

Founded by Soccer Dad, Haveil Havalim is a carnival of Jewish blogs — a weekly collection of Jewish & Israeli blog highlights, tidbits and points of interest collected from blogs all around the world. It’s hosted by different bloggers each week and coordinated by Jack. The term ‘Haveil Havalim,’ which means “Vanity of Vanities,” is from Qoheleth, (Ecclesiastes) which was written by King Solomon. King Solomon built the Holy Temple in Jerusalem and later on got all bogged down in materialism and other ‘excesses’ and realized that it was nothing but ‘hevel,’ or in English, ‘vanity.’

This week, we had the joy of celebrating what my religious school students casually refer to as “Earth Day for Jews.” Tradition asks us to eat from the fruit of the trees, particularly those from the land of Israel. We begin to anticipate spring’s promise and look forward to continued personal, professional, and emotional growth.

This “New Year for the Trees” is especially new for me, as this is my first time hosting Haveil Havalim. I enjoy my renewed connection with this blog and the opportunity to read such fine works from individuals all over the world who are a part of this community. With that, let us indulge in morsels of insight from these radiant trees of knowledge:

As always, we’ll begin with some shameless self-promotion. Eric has very interesting pieces about Hamas’ role in Gaza blackouts and Dershowitz. Anthony makes a particularly good argument about Haiti and brings us hard truths about Israel’s economics. I got excited about the Human Rights Council’s inclusion and recognition of Israel.

Personal

Rahel lets us peek into the life and struggles of a stranger at a bus stop.

Benji Lovitt makes us laugh when we read about retarded, Afro-American midgets and cripples.

Robert J. Avrech reviews Procession.

rickismom regales us with An Umbrella Tale.

Batya presents This Month’s The 50th Kosher Cooking Carnival.

neil fleischmann shares with us a series of incredibly personal stories about the grieving process.

Micah Streiffer wants to take action this Tu B’Shevat.

Harry brings us two baby naming stories and a comedic Barack Obama musical.

Jacob Richman brings us a wealth of resources for Holocaust remembrance and education.

Leah asks us if we value children and brings us some practical advice for the Tu B’Shevat seder.

Phyllis shares her experience making Mandelbrot for the first time.

Mottel presents Picture of the Week 93 – Murder Inc. Edition.

Yossi tells us what to do When The Dog Bites.

Judaism

Binyamin miller asks us about the role of questioning in Judaism.

Lady-Light gives us a series of posts about Shabbaton in the mountains; I have helped lead services in such an environment and hope it was as meaningful as my experience was.

Joshua Waxman expounds on Dybbuks and Egyptians.

Chaviva does some biblical analysis for us.

Yisrael Medad argues in Foxy Foxman – Fooey and discusses liberalism at the JPost.

Mordechai Torczyner gives us insight into tensions between congregants and rabbis.

Yechezkel gives us a lesson in Emunah.

Heshy Fried may offend you with what non-Jews may think of some Jewish rituals, a topic my 6th grade students debated last week.

M gives us a look into the Lubavitch movement.

Can you find the prayers in Peanuts? Batya can .

Ben-Yehudah presents Shlomo Riskin To Speak On Jewish-Christian Dialogue.

Israel

Batya praises Israel’s small step toward the middle.

Joel Katz lets us listen to Religion and State in Israel – January 25, 2010 (Section 1) and (Section 2).

Rahel brings us a particularly personal and moving account of gender inequalities during burial ceremonies in Israel.

Mrs. S. gives us another reason for making aliyah.

Joel Haber tells Israel’s story.

We get some choice words from westbankmama about Israeli security.

Bar Kochba curses the exile of the Jews from the land of Israel.

SnoopyTheGoon presents Shin Bet: Hamas operatives cause flooding in Haifa and Tammy Obeidallah, the Intifadagirl.

That’s it for this week! Thanks to all who submitted. I really enjoyed becoming acquainted with such a variety of good, interesting, and Jewish writing. Next week, you will find HH at Simply Jews, and you can submit your posts to that edition here.

A Country of Working Poor

The Secretary-General of the Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Mr. Angel Gurria, recently visited Israel as part of Israel’s application process to join the organisation. During his visit he issued a report regarding the current state of Israel’s economy, and improvements that need to be made to bring Israel into line with other OECD member nations.

I was very surprised to discover that, when Israel joins the OECD, it will be the poorest member country of the OECD. A statistic that was quoted is that 20% of Israel’s population is more than twice as poor as the average citizen of the OECD. For me, these statistics were surprising and somewhat frightening. I have always viewed Israel as an economically developed country. Israel has an average GDP (Gross Domestic Product) per capita of more than $28,000 per year which places it 36th on a list of over 200 countries around the world. Somehow, this does not seem the same country that will be the poorest in the OECD when Israel is admitted, hopefully later this year.

This seeming inconsistency has forced me to think a little more about the Israeli economic reality. There can be no doubt that, economically, Israel has produced a miracle in achieving all that it has in the short space of 62 years since independence. In 1948, Israel was a backward, small, underdeveloped country with no economy to speak of. It was reliant upon funding from the Jewish Diaspora and other sources of income from abroad for even the most basic requirements. During the last 62 years , Israel has developed a sophisticated banking and economic infrastructure including sectors and companies that are at the leading edge of their respective fields, and highly sought after around the world. All of this has been achieved while being forced to spend tens, and even hundreds of millions of Dollars on defence and security just to keep the state alive.

On the other hand, there are many in Israel who find making a living an impossible task. The fact that more than half of the work force is paid less than NIS 4,000 (a little more than US$1,000) per month is a frightening statistic. In certain social segments, more than 60% of citizens are living below the poverty line. These are numbers that cannot, and should not, be tolerated in a developed modern society. So even if the average GDP is highly respectable, this average hides a very nasty and important piece of information which is size of the gap between the rich and poor. It is true that the gap between rich and poor is expanding in most countries, and Israel is no exception. The problem is that Israel seems to have a much wider gap, and a much more urgent need to address the problem.

It is a well-known fact that making a living in Israel is harder than in many other countries. This is partially because of the Middle Eastern culture which is very obvious in the business and work environment. Things that are taken for granted in the western countries, from which many of us hail, are not necessarily regarded as normal behaviour in Israel. Add to that the highly bureaucratic way of doing things and the fact that each and every action requires lengthy negotiations and explanations, to contribute to a highly frustrating atmosphere. The punitive tax regime is also well-known, with Israel appearing 34th on a list of those countries having the highest tax burdens. The defence spending, it seems, is being financed by the average worker. A joke which is often told by new immigrants to Israel turns out to be true: How do you make a small fortune in Israel? Arrive with a big fortune !

The thing that bothers me most about the financial hardships suffered by many Israelis, is the fact that Israelis are not generally lazy people. Most of those struggling to make a living are employed, sometimes even working more than one job. The problem is that employees are often not earning a living wage, even to live at a very basic level. The cost of living in Israel is much higher than the average person can afford. Tel Aviv is the 17th most expensive city in which to live in the world according to the Economist Intelligence Unit’s 2009 Cost of Living Survey. This effectively makes Israel a country of working poor.

One of the criticisms of Israel mentioned by the Gurria report, is corruption. Although Gurria refers specifically to the arms and weapons industry in which Israeli companies are very active, the truth is that corruption in Israel goes a great deal further than this. Israel is a small environment where everybody knows everybody, and those who have the right contacts and know the right people seem to be the ones who make a better living. The ordinary man in the street, who works a hard and honest day, does not always seem to come out with enough money to live on. So those with the connections get richer, and those without connections get poorer. This is endemic in Israeli society from the top down. Many well-known politicians and leaders of business and industry have been proved to be acting in a dishonest manner for the purpose of enriching themselves. On many occasions, these individuals are well-off to begin with, so their corrupt behaviour seems difficult to justify. Behaviours and business practices which would never be acceptable in other countries, seem to be absolutely normal in Israel. The corruption and mutual back-scratching that goes on at the upper echelons of society, seem to come at the expense of the ordinary man, whose only objective is to make enough to feed his family.

Despite the financial hardships that plague many people, Israeli society is a surprisingly happy and positive place to live in. The advantages of living in a Jewish environment seem to outweigh the disadvantages for many people. To survive, people show a level of flexibility that appears unparalleled elsewhere. This is epitomised by the Russian immigrants who arrived in Israel with very high levels of training in fields which could not be put to use upon arrival. There were too many scientists, doctors and musicians to employ in a country the size of Israel. So those who could not find jobs in their fields became cleaners, supermarket shelf-packers and anything else that they could find. Many people with second jobs are also working in their spare time on a pet project that they hope will be the next big thing in the Internet or high-tech field. There are numerous non-profit organisations out there helping to make life easier for as many families as they can help. Although this should not be necessary in a country like Israel, it is uplifting that there are so many who go out of their way to help others enjoy an easier life. The proof is in the result, which shows many Israelis returning to live in Israel from abroad, and many new immigrants continuing to make Israel their new home.

The benefits for Israel of joining the OECD have been presented as greater international acceptance, and involvement with a respected international organisation. It is my hope that membership of the OECD may go further, and somehow help the ordinary Israeli. In order for this to happen, institutional corruption needs to be rooted out of Israeli society. In addition, the amount that people earn for a hard day’s work needs to be sufficient to allow an average family to live on. When this happens, Israel will make the real economic progress that is so badly needed to add even more to the quality of Israeli society.

Israel Allowed To Talk About Human Rights

Yesterday, Jews all over the world remembered the 65th anniversary of the liberation of the Auchwitz death camp; this day is now recognized as International Holocaust Remembrance Day. The repeated message of Holocaust awareness events is that we can never be allowed to forget the inhumane crimes committed by the Nazis during WWII. In remembering the horror to which Europe’s Jews were subjected, we vow to prevent such a terrible thing from ever occurring again.

In today’s world, thanks to political and economic alliances, an all-out war amongst the nations of Europe is virtually unthinkable. The Jewish people have a homeland in Israel, and global political institutions, like the United Nations, attempt to prevent violent conflict. These NGOs, combined with global human rights organizations, carry out the mission of protecting people from abuse; they help us accomplish the mission to “never forget.”

Unfortunately, and somewhat ironically, many international human rights organizations have a predetermined vendetta against Israel. Make no mistake: like any nation that must fight for its survival, Israel does harm the rights of its neighbors. However, I firmly believe that Israel takes pains to engage with force only when its citizens are threatened, and evidence shows that the IDF takes great pains to conduct war as humanely as possible (if a word like “humane” could ever apply to the concept of war). Whether or not Israel fulfills this goal is the subject of an entirely different discourse.

Yesterday, UN Watch reported that the Human Rights Council’s JUSCANZ group (made up of non-EU democratic nations) has approved Israel for membership. In terms of the way international NGOs understand and interact with Israel, this approval is a monumental step. By allowing Israel to participate in discussions of human rights, the council recognizes Israel’s commitment to find political solutions and reduce the harms of violent conflict. Indeed, this action has the potential of ending the consistently biased human rights propaganda war that rages between Israel and the United Nations.

In fact, it’s telling that it has taken so long for the council to recognize and include Israel. It’s easy to lob criticism at Israel from behind the confines of an exclusive group; it’s more difficult to blindly and broadly bash a nation whose diplomat is sitting across the table. Israel will likely not be welcomed warmly and with open arms, but that’s acceptable for now. What’s key is that the world is beginning to recognize the difficulties that Israel still faces every day: how can a country keep its citizens safe from an enemy that uses schoolchildren as human shields? Israel has a voice that has not been represented on the hyper-critical council, and this inclusion is long-overdue.

Let us hope that this step will be positive for Israel and the Human Rights Council. When nations with opposing viewpoints can sit across from each other, they have the power to prevent something terrible from happening.